Ultrasound-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus large-bore thrombectomy in acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: The propensity-matched EKNARI cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) and large-bore-thrombectomy (LBT) are under investigation for the treatment of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolisms (PE). Comparative studies investigating both devices are scarce. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the two most frequently used devices for treatment of acute PE. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included 125 patients undergoing LBT or USAT for intermediate- or high-risk PE between 2019 and 2023. Nearest neighbor propensity matching with logistic regression was used to achieve balance on potential confounders. The primary outcome was the change in the right to left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio between baseline and 24 h. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were included. After propensity score matching, 95 patients remained in the sample, of which 69 (73%) underwent USAT and 26 (27%) LBT. The RV/LV ratio decrease between baseline and 24 h was greater in the LBT than in the USAT group (adjusted between-group difference: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.04; p = 0.001). Both procedures were safe and adverse events occurred rarely (10% following USAT vs. 4% following LBT; p = 0.439). CONCLUSION: In acute intermediate-high and high-risk PE, both LBT and USAT were feasible and safe. The reduction in RV/LV ratio was greater following LBT than USAT. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Urokinase versus Alteplase in Patients with Intermediate-High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Treated with Ultrasound-Accelerated Endovascular Thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) is a safe and effective treatment for patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). In all studies investigating USAT in the setting of PE, the recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) alteplase or actilyse was used. Currently, there is a shortage of alteplase (Alteplase, Boehringer Ingelheim) in Europe. It is unknown whether the efficacy of urokinase (UK) is comparable with alteplase for USAT in patients with PE. METHODS: Patients with intermediate-high-risk PE undergoing USAT with urokinase and alteplase were included in this study. One-to-one nearest neighbour matching was performed to account for baseline differences. We identified one patient treated with USAT and UK (n = 9) for each patient treated with USAT and alteplase (n = 9). RESULTS: A total of 56 patients underwent USAT. The treatment was successful in all patients. The propensity score matched the identified nine pairs of patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the change in right ventricle-to-left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio (0.4 ± 0.3 versus 0.5 ± 0.4, p = 0.54), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (17.3 ± 8.0 versus 18.1 ± 8.1, p = 0.17), or improvement of RV function (5.8 ± 3.8 versus 5.1 ± 2.6, p = 1.0). The complication rates were comparable (11% in both groups, p = 0.55). There were no deaths in hospital or during 90 days in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In this case-matched comparison, the short-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes showed comparable results between USAT-UK and USAT-rt-PA.

The Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Accelerated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Patients with Intermediate-High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Bo-NE-Experience.

Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) is an advanced interventional therapy for patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) who deteriorated on anticoagulation or for high-risk patients for whom systemic thrombolysis is contraindicated. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of this therapy with a focus on the improvement of vital signs and laboratory parameters. Seventy-nine patients with intermediate-high-risk PE were treated with USAT from August 2020 to November 2022. The therapy significantly decreased the mean RV/LV ratio from 1.2 ± 0.22 to 0.9 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001) as well as the mean PAPs from 48.6 ± 11 to 30.1 ± 9.0 mmHg (p < 0.001). The respiratory and heart rate decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Serum creatinine decreased significantly from 1.0 ± 0.35 to 0.9 ± 0.3 (p < 0.001). There were 12 access-associated complications, which could be treated conservatively. One patient had haemothorax after the therapy and had to be operated on. USAT is an effective therapy for patients with intermediate-high-risk PE, with favourable hemodynamic, clinical, and laboratory outcomes.

EKOSTM in Octogenarians: The Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Accelerated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Elderly Patients with Intermediate-High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cardiovascular disease. Elderly patients with acute PE have very high mortality rates. Data concerning the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) in this age group are lacking. METHODS: Nineteen octogenarians with acute pulmonary embolism underwent USAT between August 2020 and February 2023 at two centres in Germany and were retrospectively analysed. The main efficacy measures were the right ventricle to left ventricle diameter (RV/LV) ratio, systolic right ventricle function, and invasive and echocardiographic measured systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). The main safety measures were in-hospital death and the bleeding rate according to the GUSTO bleeding score. RESULTS: USAT was associated with an improved RV/LV ratio (0.36 ± 0.29, p < 0.001), systolic right ventricle function (5.0 ± 3.8, p < 0.001), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) at 24 h after therapy (24.2 ± 11.2 mmHg and 19 ± 13.4 mmHg, p < 0.001). No in-hospital deaths or bleeding complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: USAT with EKOSTM may be a safe and effective therapeutic option for octogenarians with acute pulmonary embolism.

Infective endocarditis of a left atrial appendage closure device: a case report and literature review.

Background: Due to advances in interventional cardiology in recent years, more and more patients are currently receiving cardiac devices, with a subsequent increase in the number of patients with device-associated endocarditis. Device-associated endocarditis is a life-threatening disease with special diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Interventional devices for left atrial appendage (LAA) closure have been available for several years. However, there have been very few case reports of LAA closure device-associated endocarditis. Case summary: An 83-year-old woman presented with fever and fatigue. She had a history of permanent atrial fibrillation and recurrent bleeding on oral anticoagulation. Consequently, the patient underwent interventional LAA closure ∼20 months earlier. Blood cultures grew Staphylococcus aureus. Transoesophageal echocardiography revealed an LAA closure device-associated mobile, echo-dense mass that was consistent with infectious vegetation in this clinical context. Intravenous antibiotic therapy was started, and our heart team recommended complete removal of the device, which the patient refused. The patient subsequently died as a result of progressive endocarditis and multiple pre-existing co-morbidities. Discussion: Left atrial appendage occlusion device-associated endocarditis has rarely been reported. Due to the increase in LAA closure device implantation, device-associated endocarditis is expected to increase in the future. Transoesophageal echocardiography is required for correct diagnosis. Our case report suggests that an infection can occur long after implantation.

Multi-Center Comparison of Two Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valves: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: During the last years, several transcatheter aortic heart valves entered the clinical market and are commercially available. The prostheses differ regarding several technical and functional aspects. However, little is known regarding head-to-head comparative data of the ACURATE neo and the PORTICO valve prostheses. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare two self-expanding transcatheter aortic heart valves (THV), the ACURATE neo and the PORTICO, with regard to in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, as well as early device failures. METHODS: A total of 1591 consecutive patients with severe native aortic valve stenosis from two centers were included in the analyses and matched by 1:1 nearest neighbor matching to identify one patient treated with PORTICO (n = 344) for each patient treated with ACURATE neo (n = 344). RESULTS: In-hospital complications were comparable between both valves, including any kind of stroke (ACURATE neo = 3.5% vs. PORTICO = 3.8%; p = 1.0), major vascular complications (ACURATE neo = 4.5% vs. PORTICO = 5.4%; p = 0.99) or life-threatening bleeding (ACURATE neo = 1% vs. PORTICO = 2%; p = 0.68). The rate of device failure defined by the VARC-2 criteria were comparable, including elevated gradients and moderate-to-severe paravalvular leakage (ACURATE neo = 7.3% vs. PORTICO = 7.6%; p = 1.0). However, the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) was significantly more frequent after the use of PORTICO THV (9.5% vs. 18.7%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In this two-center case-matched comparison, short-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes showed comparable results between PORTICO and ACURATE neo prostheses. However, PORTICO was associated with a significant higher incidence of PPI.

Aortic valve replacement in Germany in 2019.

AIMS: Both surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are established options to treat aortic valve stenosis. We present the outcome of the complete cohort of all patients undergoing SAVR or TAVI in Germany during the calendar year 2019. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data concerning all isolated aortic valve procedures performed in Germany in 2019 were retrieved from the mandatory nationwide quality control program: 22,973 transvascular (TV)-TAVI procedures, 7905 isolated SAVR (iSAVR), and 1413 transapical (TA)-TAVI. Data was complete in 99.9% (n = 32,156). In-hospital mortality after TV-TAVI (2.3%) was significantly lower when compared with iSAVR (2.8%, p = 0.007) or TA-TAVI (6.3%; p < 0.001). Expected mortality was calculated with a new version of the German Aortic valve score (AKL Score) based on the data of either catheter-based (AKL-CATH) or surgical (AKL-CHIR) aortic valve replacements in Germany in 2018. TV-TAVI and iSAVR both showed lower observed mortality in 2019 than expected based on their respective performance in 2018, yielding an observed/expected (O/E) mortality ratio < 1. This was particularly apparent for patients at low risk. After exclusion of emergency procedures, in-hospital mortality after TV-TAVI (2.1%) and after iSAVR (2.1%) was identical, even though patients undergoing TV-TAVI showed a considerably higher perioperative risk profile. CONCLUSION: After excluding emergency procedures, in-hospital mortality of TV-TAVI and iSAVR in 2019 in Germany was identical. In 2019, TV-TAVI and iSAVR both show lower matched mortality ratios compared with 2018, which suggests technical improvements of both therapies.